Submission on the Climate Change Response (Moderated Emissions Trading) Amendment Bill

Here is a summary of the Commissioner's submission to the Finance and Expenditure Committee on the Climate Change Response (Modified Emissions Trading) Amendment Bill. The full report is available in pdf format on the right.

Summary of recommendations

Allocation of free carbon credits should only be granted if there is a genuine reason for it, and these reasons should be stated publicly for each particular activity, industry or sector that receives allocation.

New Zealand should not align itself with Australia’s proposed scheme.

A cap on the number of carbon credits freely allocated is vital to create the right incentives, and to reduce fiscal risk to the Government and policy uncertainty for business.

The phase-out of free carbon credits is far too slow. The phase-out rate of allocation should specify the latest year that allocation will be given.

Allocation to the agriculture sector should be reviewed, because current plans are inadequate for many reasons.

Transparency, which is critical for building public trust in the scheme needs to be increased, particularly regarding allocation. There are two clear ways to do this:

- The number of free credits that are allocated, as well as the rationale for it, should be reported each year, by activity, industry or sector, by the Registry for emissions units.

- Greater scrutiny to past and future allocation should be applied during the review process.

Allocation provided to protect competitiveness should be re-assessed more regularly than 5 yearly, and a mechanism to fast-track allocation changes should be created.

The provisions that are meant to reduce the negative impacts of the ETS on the tree weed problem should be strengthened.